Form was completed yesterday by android

As no computer was available(didn't like that part at all):
http://ausertimes.blogspot.com/2018/09/from-here-okay.html?m=1

War for Russian existance is coming - like it or not

Slavic relations(diplomatic and even spiritual) between Moscow/Belgrade and rest of the world deteriorated into bellow nothing. http://sp.nicovideo.jp/watch/sm33945840

Facebook kept crashing, and I can't afford pathetic video quality as seen here either https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2195073290568055&id=100001962176474

or here

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2190077334400984&id=100001962176474

To be translated into Polish language and served to refugee board as supplementary document in appeal

Warszawa, dnia 28 września 2018r.
Rada do Spraw Uchodźców

za pośrednictwem
Szefa Urzędu do spraw Cudzoziemców
Departament Legalizacji Pobytu
ul. Taborowa 33
02-699 Warszawa


Strona: 

Bastjan Avsec
ul. Ustronie 29
95-073 Grotniki
 

sygn. sprawy: DPU.420.1161.2018

Supplemental documentation submitted with a appeal letter to refugee Board



CONCERNS ODWOŁANIE OD DECYZJI SZEFA URZĘDU DO SPRAW CUDZOZIEMCÓW Z DNIA 5 WRZEŚNIA 2018R., SYGN. SPRAWY DPU.420.1161.2018 O UMORZENIU POSTĘPOWANIA


I add to original appeal used against the decision of the Head of the Office for Foreigners(decision made on September 5, 2018, reference number DPU.420.1161.2018) also this very document which should serve as supplement to original appeal with detailed explanation on why EU's protocol number 24(no right to apply for political asylum/protection in EU member state if citizen of another EU member state) is completely invalid(illegal) and how Polish Head of the Office for Foreigners has even violated Polish constitution with his decision.

#1 REFERENCE TO VIOLATIONS OF POLISH CONSTITUTION

1)Gross violation of art. 7, 77, k.p.a. by omitting any assessment of the evidence gathered in the case:

Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego https://goo.gl/dw28eL


Art.7. k.p.a In the course of the proceedings, public administration bodies shall uphold the rule of law and take all necessary steps to thoroughly explain the facts and to settle the matter, bearing in mind the public interest and the legitimate interest of citizens.

Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego https://goo.gl/HCH5Ar

Art. 77. § 1. k.p.a The public administration body is obliged to comprehensively collect and consider all evidence.

2) Gross violation of art. 107 § 3 k.p.a. by the lack of any justification regarding the facts of the case:

Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego https://goo.gl/USFWDe

Art. 107 § 3. k.p.a The factual rationale of the decision should, in particular, indicate the facts that the authority found to be evidenced, the evidence on which it was based, and the reasons for which other evidence refused to be credible and probative, and the legal justification - clarification of the legal basis of the decision, citation of the law.

3) Gross violation of art. 105 § 1 k.p.a. by unjustifiably discontinuing the proceedings in question:

Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego https://goo.gl/ZZnP6e

Art. 105 § . When the proceedings for any reason become pointless in whole or in part, the public administration body issues a decision to discontinue the proceedings in full or in part, respectively.

Note in respect to violations of Polish constitution: 

Nothing has been done so far in respect to Art. 7 k.p.a and Art. 77. § 1. k.p.a, Art. 107 § 3 k.p.a. as required by Polish constitution and art. 105 § 1 k.p.a. was even misused to unjustifiably discontinue here mentioned proceeding in question.

#2 REFERENCE TO PARADOX(CONTROVERSIAL) WHICH CONCERNS EUROPEAN UNION'S PROTOCOL NUMBER 24(Document 12008E/PRO/24 - no right for EU citizens to apply for political asylum/protection in another EU member state) KNOWN ALSO AS CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION WHICH IS USED WITH SOLE PURPOSE AND THAT IS TO VIOLATE BASIC RIGHTS OF EUROPEAN UNION'S CITIZENS - USED TO PROHIBIT EU CITIZENS EVEN FROM WHAT IS GRANTED TO THIRD WORLD'S IMMIGRANTS TO EUROPEAN UNION IN RESPECT TO LIFE PROTECTION.

PROTOCOL NUMBER 24

https://goo.gl/SUGhQF

PROTOCOL (No 24)

ON ASYLUM FOR NATIONALS OF MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES,

1) WHEREAS, in accordance with Article 6(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the Union recognises the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights,

2) WHEREAS pursuant to Article 6(3) of the Treaty on European Union, fundamental rights, as guaranteed by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, constitute part of the Union's law as general principles,

3) WHEREAS the Court of Justice of the European Union has jurisdiction to ensure that in the interpretation and application of Article 6, paragraphs (1) and (3) of the Treaty on European Union the law is observed by the European Union,

4) WHEREAS pursuant to Article 49 of the Treaty on European Union any European State, when applying to become a Member of the Union, must respect the values set out in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union,

5) BEARING IN MIND that Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union establishes a mechanism for the suspension of certain rights in the event of a serious and persistent breach by a Member State of those values,

6) RECALLING that each national of a Member State, as a citizen of the Union, enjoys a special status and protection which shall be guaranteed by the Member States in accordance with the provisions of Part Two of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

7) BEARING IN MIND that the Treaties establish an area without internal frontiers and grant every citizen of the Union the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States,

8) WISHING to prevent the institution of asylum being resorted to for purposes alien to those for which it is intended,

9) WHEREAS this Protocol respects the finality and the objectives of the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 relating to the status of refugees,

10) HAVE AGREED UPON the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

Sole Article

Given the level of protection of fundamental rights and freedoms by the Member States of the European Union, Member States shall be regarded as constituting safe countries of origin in respect of each other for all legal and practical purposes in relation to asylum matters. Accordingly, any application for asylum made by a national of a Member State may be taken into consideration or declared admissible for processing by another Member State only in the following cases:

(a) if the Member State of which the applicant is a national proceeds after the entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam, availing itself of the provisions of Article 15 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, to take measures derogating in its territory from its obligations under that Convention;

(b) if the procedure referred to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union has been initiated and until the Council, or, where appropriate, the European Council, takes a decision in respect thereof with regard to the Member State of which the applicant is a national;

(c) if the Council has adopted a decision in accordance with Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union in respect of the Member State of which the applicant is a national or if the European Council has adopted a decision in accordance with Article 7(2) of that Treaty in respect of the Member State of which the applicant is a national;

(d) if a Member State should so decide unilaterally in respect of the application of a national of another Member State; in that case the Council shall be immediately informed; the application shall be dealt with on the basis of the presumption that it is manifestly unfounded without affecting in any way, whatever the cases may be, the decision-making power of the Member State.

End of Protocol #24

AND

European Convention on Human Rights https://goo.gl/9gKY3V

1) I cite paragraph #7 of protocol 24 which is in gross violation with European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as well as in gross violation with protocol 24 itself(is contradicting itself):

"BEARING IN MIND that the Treaties establish an area without internal frontiers and grant every citizen of the Union the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States"

Explanation:


It is not freely when you are blacklisted on job market, not freely when you are prohibited from even visiting state employment agency for job search, where you have no right to unemployment compensation, not freely where police acts against you with extreme prejudice and even once police is found guilty by court at police station one continues to act against you with most criminal/illegal manners possible, not freely where tortured via psychiatry(almost killed on three occasions) for no less than 5 years due to exercising freedom of expression, not freely where denied the right to domestic court/legal system which is even used against you in most oppressive ways possible in your country, and not freely where denied the right to European Union Court for Human Rights or Ombudsman for no less than 8 years.....not so freely for you to call monster known as “freely move/reside within EU territory” as such when in another country where you can “freely” move to and of which language you don't even speak because EU court repeatedly violates your plea for help(for no less than 10 years did EU court violated “freely” in this case), you are not allowed to apply even for what is granted to third world's nationals in respect to basic life protection...




2) I cite paragraph #8 of protocol 24 which is again in gross violation with European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as well as in gross violation with protocol 24 itself(is contradicting itself):

"WISHING to prevent the institution of asylum being resorted to for purposes alien to those for which it is intended,"

Explanation:

IS RELATED TO WORDS ONLY, BUT ONE DOESN'T APPLY LEGITIMACY OF THOSE EVEN WHEN IT COMES TO THEORETICAL PART(“wishing” is one thing and law is something else)....

“Wishing” is actually a MUST for European Union's citizens per European Union or we should say one results in “no right to apply for”(victims of persecution don't have a choice as a result of "wishing").


WHEN IT COMES TO PRACTICAL PARTS AS IS EXPLAINED ABOVE “WISHING TO RESERVE ASYLUM FOR ALIENS” AND “RESIDE FREELY WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF THE MEMBER STATES"(HOW COULD IT BE FREELY WHEN CLAUSE ITSELF IN PROTOCOL 24 ALREADY SUGGESTS/SPECIFIES CRIME/PROBLEMS WITHIN VICTIM'S SYSTEM WHICH FORCES ONE TO ABDICATE/LEAVE LOCATION FOR FOREIGN STATE AND SINCE LEGAL SYSTEM ITSELF DOESN'T FUNCTION FOR HIM/HER NOR ON DOMESTIC/STATE AND NOR ON BROADER EUROPEAN UNION'S LEVEL.... ONE IS THEREFORE COMPELLED TO ANOTHER EU LOCATION WHERE CAN'T EVEN BE CONSIDERED EVEN WITH SAME RIGHTS AS ALIENS ARE. BECAUSE OF “WISHING to reserve AND can move freely” - CLAUSE CONTRADICTS ITSELF TOTALLY AND IS AS CRIMINAL AS IT GETS) NOBODY ASKS(such clause is DELIBERATELY missing protocol 24) PERSECUTED EUROPEAN UNION CITIZENS ABOUT WHAT THEIR WISH IS IN RESPECT TO "RESERVE".


Nobody asks victims of crime neither as per what they wish for before and after crime happens to them unless off course you claim that crime/corruption/criminality doesn't exist on the territory of European Union what off course clearly suggests on insanity...

Insanity which,however, is still somehow seen by those who have created such law as real/legitimate gesture/answer to needs of European Union's citizens.

3) I cite paragraph #9 of protocol 24 which is in gross violation with European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as well as in gross violation with protocol 24 itself(is contradicting itself):

"WHEREAS this Protocol respects the finality and the objectives of the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 relating to the status of refugees,"

Even BASIC 1951 Refugee Convention of United Nations' multilateral treaty is totally violated since one defines who refugee is and which sets out the rights of individuals who are granted asylum and the responsibilities of nations that grant asylum !!!

4) I cite the main text and sub paragraph "a" of the "SOLE ARTICLE" pertaining to the paragraph of protocol 24 which is in gross violation(again contradiction) with European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as well as in gross violation with protocol 24 itself(is contradicting itself) as member states have duty not only to provide protection for me as a refugee per 1951 Refugee Convention of United Nations, but to also act accordingly against violator member state as required per Article 7 of the treaty on European Union(it's also why the impartial decision of Polish immigration chief Mr. Rafal Rogala to turn this political asylum application down before one was even considered...Mr. Rafal Rogala knows very well what subtext b), c), d) of SUB ARTICLE in Protocol 24 means for Slovenia, Belgrade, and Moscow in this case).

"HAVE AGREED UPON the following provisions, which shall be annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union:

Sole Article's text of Protocol 24 as seen above:

Given the level of protection of fundamental rights and freedoms by the Member States of the European Union, Member States shall be regarded as constituting safe countries of origin in respect of each other for all legal and practical purposes in relation to asylum matters. Accordingly, any application for asylum made by a national of a Member State may be taken into consideration or declared admissible for processing by another Member State only in the following cases:

(a) if the Member State of which the applicant is a national proceeds after the entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam, availing itself of the provisions of Article 15 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, to take measures derogating in its territory from its obligations under that Convention;"

I will not even go into subtext of Sole Article b), c), and d)

And portion(more about Article 15 is explained bellow) of Article 15 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms since one is mentioned in above paragraph which pertains to Protocol 24.

In time of war or other public emergency threatening the life of the nation any High Contracting Party may take measures derogating from its obligations under this Convention to the extent strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, provided that such measures are not inconsistent with its other obligations under international law.

Explanation:

From European Union perspective, paragraph above attempts to mislead entire European Union deal in respect to rights of its citizens as specified in core proclamation to several countries which have signed Maastricht/Amsterdam deal in 1999 while in reality every EU member state is liable for its wrongdoings..

Even “work in progress” issue can be encountered at the end of the page at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Amsterdam

I cite, “The Amsterdam Treaty did not settle all institutional questions. Work was still in progress on reforming the institutions to make them capable of operating effectively and democratically in a much enlarged EU. “ and what makes whole document even more illegal/criminal.

SLOVENIA DIDN'T SIGN TREATY OF AMSTERDAM, BUT HER VIOLATIONS ARE OUTLINED IN BASIC EUROPEAN UNION TREATY COVERING RIGHTS OF ITS CITIZENS.

Further, Slovenia have signed Consolidated Treaty on European Union https://goo.gl/DDjJBX (scroll down to Article 52).

In fact, Protocol No. 11 to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) was ratified by all

Council of Europe member States - in other words, ratified by all the forty-one Contracting

States Parties to the ECHR including Slovenia.

THE BIGGEST STRIKE – THIS PARAGRAPH OF PROTOCOL 24(main text and sub paragraph "a" of the "SOLE ARTICLE") TOTALLY CONTRADICTS EVERYTHING MENTIONED IN THIS DOCUMENT(entire document 12008E/PRO/24 as seen here is annulled as a result of paradox).....

FACTS THAT NUMEROUS LEGAL CASES ON BEHALF OF SLOVENIAN CITIZENS WERE ALREADY CARRIED OUT VIA EUROPEAN UNION'S COURT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS(this is important to note as this alone binds Slovenia just as other member states to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - to article #15 basically) AGAINST SLOVENIAN STATE , AND THAT SLOVENIA WAS NOT FACING ARTICLE 15 CRISES OF ANY KIND DURING MOST SEVERE VIOLATIONS OF EU/INTERNATIONAL TREATIES/LAWS USED AGAINST ITS NATIVE CITIZEN, MAKES SLOVENIA LIABLE FOR EVERYTHING STATED ON MY OFFICIAL COMPLAIN https://goo.gl/ZzLD89

Above paragraph of Protocol 24 violates : Treaty on European Union, fundamental rights, as guaranteed by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – specifically violates Article 49 of the Treaty on European Union I cite, “any European State, when applying to become a Member of the Union, must respect the values set out in Article 2 of the Treaty on Union"(SLOVENIA GROSSLY VIOLATED THIS RIGHT) and Article 6(3) of the Treaty on European Union where it states as explained above on how European Union should/shall respect fundamental rights as guaranteed by European union(related to Rome statute signed on 4 November 1950).


Article 49 of the Treaty(Lisbon Treaty) on European Union states: 

Any European state which respects the values referred to in Article 2 and is committed to promoting them may apply to become a member of the Union. The European Parliament and national Parliaments shall be notified of this application.

Protocol 24 is in violation with Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by its protocols No. 11 and No. 14(basic human rights that is) as well as with Article No. 9(guaranteed freedom of thought, conscience and religion which in my case first was created and then violated by Moscow/ Belgrade/ Ljubljana via forms of extreme torture methods from which mentioned parties have even profited economically).



With paragraph 24 and impartial decision of Mr. Rogala, 1951 Refugee Convention of United Nations' multilateral treaty was totally violated since one defines who refugee is and which sets out the rights of individuals who are granted asylum and the responsibilities of nations that grant asylum !!!

THUS DECLINING ME THE RIGHT TO APPLY FOR POLITICAL ASYLUM AS HUMAN BEING IN ANOTHER MEMBER STATE IS COMPLETELY ILLEGAL AND MOST CRIMINAL ACT POSSIBLE. EVEN MORE SO BECAUSE I AM VICTIM OF INTERNATIONAL CONSPIRACY(MKULTRA CASE WHICH LASTED FOR NO LESS THAN 20 YEARS – INTENSIVELY FOR NO LESS THAN 13 YEARS)....CASE WHICH INVOLVES TOP POLITICIANS AND WORLD GOVERNMENTS(incl. Belgium and Germany where I ALREADY applied for political asylum in the past, and have done in return other than retaliation for my exercising what belongs as basic right to every human being on earth - City of Budapest in Hungary have even stolen my car from Free parking lot" same day when I attempted to apply for political asylum in 2017) WESTERN AND EASTERN EUROPEAN STATES AS WELL AS NORTHERN AMERICA.

Having regard to the above-mentioned complaints, I am asking for the annulment of the contested decision and for the case to be reconsidered by the first instance authority.

Seven(7) days to add extra documentation to appeal...Scenario from part one repeats

There should be a day without food tomorrow is how I was told sadistically  under MKultra https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2190077334400984&id=100001962176474

I will just present a video on situation and a screen shots which make situation understandable(under what circumstances and why is so is explained).

Letter in Polish which gives me 7 days to add extra documentation to appeal in Polish language off course...

Situation here, however, is nothing as geniuses of Pahor/ Zeman/ Kaczynski caliber and so on have predicted would be...it's stable and well managed. Things will turn for much better.

Got nothing to do with library lady which should have been replaced during absence (had compulsory work on other location an re certification examinations) by another state employee. 

What was sent to attorney

What was done to telephone most likely via what should have been free Wi-Fi at immigration centers

What "free" wifi looked like for me for the last month and half...I don't think you would use one either...related to video bellow.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2188814221193962&id=100001962176474

Who, how, and why...

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2188218261253558&id=100001962176474

In Orwellian Gestapo agency known as SOVA(Slovenian spy agency used to surveillance ethnic Slovenian population for the sake of great Serbia), enemies of Slovenian nation protest/demonstrate for over 9 months already

To understand what is going on in this organisation created under UDBA criminal known as Borut Pahor, watch video at https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2190077334400984&id=100001962176474

Pro Belgrade(Moscow) UDBA criminal have already appointed his successor...

Yet another mental patient interested in ethnic cleansing of Slovenian nation - just as his mentor was...Borut Pahor was personal mentor of Marjan Sarec...

The rest is blah blah...they get very very good money every month for spying on Slovenian natives and protest something that no one knows what...

Situation in Slovenia is super alarming as same could be done with nations elsewhere(is happening also in Ukraine where Russian terrorists murder journalists and activists on daily bases). 

From(in 2017 when Slovenian fifth colon went on strike) https://www.b92.net/eng/news/region.php?yyyy=2017&mm=12&dd=07&nav_id=102989 

AND from what was released several hours ago https://www.aktualno24.si/news/slovenija-l3gdmw8znoq3k7lr6pjyx2e7

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rtvslo.si/amp/slovenija/v-sovi-stavkajo-ze-devet-mesecev-zapletene-razmere-bo-skusal-resiti-rajko-kozmelj/467116

A bit more in respect to Mr. Marcin Rau(PhD Candidate in International Crime Law related to US president DONALD TRUMP) and details on how MKULTRA was designed(nice to meet you/nice to see you again).

Related to http://ausertimes.blogspot.com/2018/09/staff-member-was-identifieds-donald.html

Original video about Mr. Marcin

This is the compensation claim with which I will head on the court with

Either 200 billion USD or 3% of the trade between Eastern Europe and West(incl. and specially state of Israel) - both ways between years 1998 and 2007 is what you owe me. Whatever is of greater value.

Putin alone is worth today 200 bil. USD and have done or gone nothing for things to happen. He caused more damage than good.

I didn't asked for it...you did and this under MKULTRA circumstances.

NO WAY WILL I LOOSE IN POLAND - KGB CAUSED PROBLEMS TO EXTEND THAT THIS VERY LETTER WAS NOT PREPARED ON TIME, BUT IT WILL BE

Still working on it...work in progress ;)

Bearing in mind the above, I am also asking for the whole decision being lifted and for the granting of refugee status, possibly for granting subsidiary protection, and I propose optional to repeal the decision in its entirety and refer the case to the first instance authority for reconsideration.

I accuse the contested decision  of the Polish Head of the Office for Foreigners as well as protocol number 24 issued by European Union as Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union as totally illegal/criminal/inhumane and more than anything genocidal. 

REFERENCE

Violations of Polish constitution:

3. a gross violation of art. 7, 77, kp.a. by omitting any assessment of the evidence gathered in the case:

Art. 7. In the course of the proceedings, public administration bodies shall uphold the rule of law and take all necessary steps to thoroughly explain the facts and to settle the matter, bearing in mind the public interest and the legitimate interest of citizens.

Art. 77. § 1. The public administration body is obliged to comprehensively collect and consider all evidence.

2. a gross violation of art. 107 § 3 k.p.a. by the lack of any justification regarding the facts of the case:

Art. 107 § 3. The factual rationale of the decision should, in particular, indicate the facts that the authority found to be evidenced, the evidence on which it was based, and the reasons for which other evidence refused to be credible and probative, and the legal justification - clarification of the legal basis of the decision, citation of the law.

1. a gross violation of art. 105 § 1 k.p.a. by unjustifiably discontinuing the proceedings in question:

Art. 105 § . When the proceedings for any reason become pointless in whole or in part, the public administration body issues a decision to discontinue the proceedings in full or in part, respectively. "

INJECT NUMBER 24 EXPLANATION - http://ausertimes.blogspot.com/2018/09/part-1-murderous-protocol-no-24-of.html AND TRANSLATE WHOLE THING INTO POLISH LANGUAGE

SUBSTANTIATION

At the outset of this appeal, particular attention should be paid to the substantive and legal regulation regarding the granting of international protection to a foreigner. This is important because the content of the indicated provisions and the conditions included in them condition and specify the direction in which the proceedings in the subject of granting international protection should be carried out.

Asylum seekers seek international protection on the grounds that they can not return or be returned to their country of origin because they have a reasonable fear of persecution or are subjected to ill-treatment or other serious harm. The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights explicitly guarantees the right to asylum. Although the ECHR does not guarantee the right to obtain asylum, the expulsion state may be required to refrain from expelling a person who is threatened with death or ill-treatment in the host country.

In accordance with international refugee law, an asylum seeker who claims to be afraid of persecution has the right to a refugee status if he can demonstrate both a well-founded fear of persecution because of the 1951 Geneva Convention and insufficient protection from the countries. Sufficient protection from the state means that in the host country there is both a readiness and the ability of state officials or other entities controlling parts of the country's territory to provide through its legal system a reasonable level of protection against ill-treatment, which the applicant is afraid of for asylum. In addition, Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union guarantees the right to asylum, which includes compliance with the principle of non-refoulement. And Article 19 of the Charter states that no one may be removed from the territory of the state, expelled or extradited to a state where he would be subject to the death penalty, torture or other inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. According to art. 3 the State will be liable in the event of expulsion, when it is reasonably demonstrated that the individual was at risk of actual torture.

Therefore, public administration bodies, while upholding the rule of law, ex officio or at the request of the parties, should take all actions necessary to thoroughly clarify the factual situation and to settle the matter with a view primarily to the public interest. This obligation means that the authority should not only collect evidence necessary for the proper settlement of the case, but also that it will carry out evidence indicated by the party, if relevant. "With the allegations described, it is impossible to accept that the material collected in the case the evidence was recognized and assessed in a reliable manner, allowing to draw reasonable conclusions from them.    

The authority in the justification of the decision refuses to refer to the lack of legal and factual basis necessary for the substantive examination of the application. However, no action has been taken to update knowledge about the political situation in my country, so that the authority did not give me the opportunity to prove my case.  

As a citizen of Slovenia, I was repeatedly subjected to torture and cruel and inhumane treatment connected with the political life of the country SINCE MY CHILDHOOD WHEN OCCUPIED BY GREAT SERBIA KNOWN ALSO AS YUGOSLAVIA(same as Poland was occupied by USSR).

Due to my personal views and opposition to the pro Belgrade and Moscow authorities in country of origin known as Slovenia(one have recently even changed/regrouped our national origins from Western Slavic - same as Slovak, Polish, Czech - to Southern Slavic group), I am asking Poland for help. I experienced enormous amount of unpleasantness by self elected authorities. 

I was subjected to both physical and psychological violence to the extent that cost me three times loss of life in psychiatric hospital and assassination attempts took place as well. 

All these events were aimed at eliminating me as a human being, as I was involved heavily in politics and my views were inconvenient for the state.

Therefore my fear of persecution is fully justified, as well as the reason for applying for international protection on the territory of the Republic of Poland. .

In view of the above, I am bringing in this petition and I reserve the right to submit further letters and requests in the case.

PART 1 - MURDEROUS PROTOCOL (No 24) OF EUROPEAN UNION BROKEN – known also as Document 12008E/PRO/24

Related to http://ausertimes.blogspot.com/2018/09/part-1-murderous-protocol-no-24-of.html

Failed to turn share option on, so here it is again

What was sent to Polish chief of Immigration(Szef Urzędu do spraw Cudzoziemców - Departament Legalizacji Pobytu) as an response by one of the attorneys who was willing to assist me and a legal clinic..

Important to accent is that it was done on time and as you are about to see all in Polish as required. I consider responses as sufficient to Polish Immigration authorities, but I will create my own version in Polish response which will be upgraded from what you see is here.

On time.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/19Aem6cdmkho0yWS9YlWRkVgQI9_LXP38/view?usp=sharing What I will go with as they will call and ask me which one of the two to proceed with...its a very good letter and I am thankful for one.

and second response(ALSO GREAT FOR STUDIES, BUT I WILL GO WITH NUMBER ONE FOR NOW AND DEFEND MYSELF ON COURT WITH OWN VERSION).

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JiacFrLqmV-DFTJqvkSdSUbN82eBPb9s/view?usp=sharing

I feel pitty for Moscow and even more for entire Russian society which didn't

Progress much from century ago

Russia presents extremely serious threat to civilized world.

Girl is psychologist and friend of Andreja Jeric - Slovenian nurse who expressed interest in me when subjected to MKultra and would latter pay me hose visitations per Belgrade. She too became subject to primitive Moscowian Belgradian politics and have consequently resented me deeply. I am sorry to have caused all this problems and would do anything to correct them.

Russia famous for rapes in the past didn't change even a bit...feel for Russian women. Putan Putanowich(he injected via his crew an individual in her life) life threatened for posting what you are about to hear...I wander what did Melania saw when she met him NOT, but its why(so Moscow wouldn't look as bad) Trump(a financial criminal and a serial rapist), and  was elected as president as well no !!??????

PART 1 - MURDEROUS PROTOCOL (No 24) OF EUROPEAN UNION BROKEN – known also as Document 12008E/PRO/24

My intention is clear...create detailed response to murderous European union's law known as "no right to apply for political asylum/protection in EU member state if citizen of another EU member state" which Serbia and Russia are using on territory of EU via corrupt politicians to get things done their way via extreme violence, and use one to contact international agencies in respect to one - contact international agencies such as ICC, UN and also individual EU member states in respect to one and get one nulled/voided(Croatia/ Polish Sejm/ Czech rep./ Slovakia and so on must be contacted as violators of such laws as is Slovenia can/must also be severely punished via Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union establishes a mechanism for the suspension of certain rights in the event of a serious and persistent breach by a Member State).

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZQLL2JzifUsbewLYypTCb1pf6v1PAlJh/view?usp=sharing

Then what I will do is to have whole thing translated to Polish language and use attorney which greatly assisted me along with Polish university(will keep confidential for now who and how - none of what you see here would I produce myself) to create more pressure on Polish immigration issues as well. Nevertheless, you can use seen here to save yourself if in similar situation as I am...

This is just part one, now part two will follow and perhaps even part three and then whole thing will be assembled...I am just giving you a little taste on what I am working on right now.

PLEASE DONATE/SUPPORT(click) TO THIS NEWS SITE(whatever is that you want to donate) so I can purchase at least basic work related necessities. Thank you for your help.

Just had thought today on how nice would it be to have your job guys...it would look like a part time to me(I invest 7 days in what you see here) and on top of that would get paid...think about it.

TRAGIC SIMILARITIES BETWEEN POLISH AND SLOVENIAN NATIONS: Should Polish nation be substituted IN Poland by Russians just as the case is with native Slovenians in Slovenia !!?????

Related to http://ausertimes.blogspot.com/2018/09/in-sloveniawhere-i-ran-from-and-from.html

Forget Ukraine where the worst is happening(off course if that is not scary enough - imagine what they would do to you if they could who is not related to them as much as Ukrainians are)...Ukrainian people are classified as Eastern Slavs and are related to Russians just as Slovenes are related to Poles(also to Czechs and Slovaks|)...

Slovenian natives(were and are Western Slavs and are now even illegally de-categorized/de-classified into group of South Slavs - can be seen everywhere on internet and it all happened because of UDBA individual Borut Pahor who managed to convince with lies Polish Kaczynski brothers, a Czech drunk Milos Zeman and possibly even some other idiot who seats in influential for Slovenian nation political chair) have just like Poles had almost the same enemy throughout the history and last liberator was almost the same too. 

SIMILARITIES

Slovenia just like Poland ceased to exist at times and was finally liberated by partisan(Slovenian, Croat, Serbian, Macedonia, Montenegro, Bosnian and in the end of the war even by red army) and red army movement in WWII(AGAIN just like Poland), but should this also mean end of Polish and Slovene nations !!?!????

Poland too was liberated by partisans and red army...should one be therefore just as the case is with Slovenian people replaced by Russians(in Slovenia Serbs took over and there is more and more Russians present as well for which no real official statistics exist) thanks to politicians alike Kaczynski/ Zeman/ Pahor/ Vucic and son on !!?????? 

Because this is all it takes and before you know, you become foreigner in own land...red star fascist fuhrer on level of Borut Pahor(MILAN KUCAN) will more than gladly rewrite history of your(his own) nation and before you know, you are out. 

The rest "police"(selected by UDBA officials and same applies to Slovenian courts as well as to field of psychiatry) will take care the rest...blacklisting/blackballing of an individual on job market is totally unregulated in the world(there is no one you can complain about to in respect to this issue even on international level) as this is the main instrument of New World's Order....

IF YOU DISBELIEVE THAT THIS CAN BE DONE, THINK >>SLOVENIA<< !!!

Belarus KGB agent Valerio against whom I have filed police complaint is in the Polish immigration system already for years is what I was told

Will never ever release by whom, but Polish immigration system is now very very questionable https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2178666355542082&id=100001962176474

RUSSIAN PRESS CONCERNED(for Putin or Le Pen ?? Perhaps both ???): Marine Le Pen "How far will they go?!" - well Le Pen, how far have they gone in your case against you so far(there was nothing other than blah blah from their side and free morning coffee with excellent pay for you) and what exactly have you done for other political activists for world to consider you as legitimate politician !!?????

On questions above the answer is "NOTHING".

Playing the persecuted at expense of the persecuted is the name of the game(YOUR GAME) Le Pen...

What you see here will never happen to Putin because the results would come out 100% as positive for mental sickness.

Le Pen is a staunch supporter of invasion on Ukraine and as such, she deserves the proper place on this news site.

TERRORISM WITHOUT BORDERS...THIS IS WHY EASTERN EUROPE IS IN FLAMES https://www.ft.com/content/010eec62-30b5-11e7-9555-23ef563ecf9a

From Putin's personal outlet RT.COM

French politician Marine Le Pen said a court ordered her to undergo psychiatric evaluation over a series of images she posted on Twitter showing Islamic State executions. She slammed the order as a “mind-blowing.”

The president of France's National Rally (formerly Front National) has released an order saying it comes from the magistrates in Nanterre near Paris, calling on her to “undergo a psychiatric examination."

"For denouncing the horrors of Daesh (Islamic State/IS, formerly ISIS) by tweets the "justice system" has referred [me] to a psychiatric assessment. How far will they go?!" she tweeted in response.

The 2017 presidential candidate denounced the order as “mind-blowing,” saying: “This regime is really starting to scare [us].”

French major outlet BMFTV, which also broke the story, said that the procedure was in fact a “common” occurrence. The comment did not go down well with Le Pen though, who branded the claim “a lie.” Such an examination is required of “pedophiles or [those with] sexual deviance,” she argued.

In December of 2015, Le Pen tweeted three pictures of killings carried out by IS terrorists accompanied by the text “Daesh [Arabic term for ISIS] is THIS!” The tweets had been a response to journalist Jean-Jacques Bourdin, who compared Le Pen’s nationalist rhetoric to that of the Islamic terrorist group.

One of the pictures showed the body of James Foley, whom the extremists beheaded in August 2014. Back then his family said they had been “deeply disturbed by the unsolicited use of Jim for Le Pen’s political gain.”

Le Pen later deleted the images. Speaking to French media earlier this year she said that she is being charged for “having condemned the horrors of Daesh.”

If convicted, the politician faces a maximum punishment of a €75,000 fine and up to three years in prison.

A number of politicians have lambasted the judges’ decision towards Le Pen. According to National Assembly member Gilbert Collard, the order simply means “the psychiatrization of political opinion.”

Italian Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini also took to Twitter to express support for the French politician. “A court orders a psychiatric assessment for Marine Le Pen. Words fail me! Solidarity with her and with the French who love freedom!” he wrote.

This is not the first time Marine Le Pen has locked horns with the authorities. In 2017, roughly two months before the presidential election, she was summoned by judges for alleged misuse of EU funds. The court said that Le Pen’s staff was fictitiously employed at the European Parliament as assistants. She denied the allegations.

This July, French judges blocked €2 million of subsidies to Le Pen’s party. Le Pen condemned the move as “a blow to democracy,” since withholding the funding would likely result in her party becoming defunct.