Have JUDAS David Duke managed to finally cause enough damage to Donald Trump, so media could use one as an alibi of rigged elections' outcome against Trump !!??

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Corrupt and tyrannical British government blocks the will of the white British people who have won state held Brexit referendum !!!

My poster which I have used to promote freedom of native white British people vs Marxist Zooropa !!!

To understand what is going on, lets first learn what article 50 is and what are functions that High Court in UK can or can't perform !!! Lets learn from beginning to the end per what exactly is going on(who, how, and why)...

Lets see:

What is article 50 !!?

Article 50 is withdrawal from the European Union..it is the legal and political process whereby a Member state of the European Union (EU) exercises its right under the Treaty on European Union (TEU) to cease to be a member of the union.

What is High Court in UK !!?

Her Majesty's High Court of Justice in England (the High Court) consists of three branches(divisions):

---the Queen's Bench Division(will handle supervisory jurisdiction over all inferior courts and its Administrative Court is generally the appropriate legal forum where the validity of official decisions may be challenged. Generally, unless specific appeal processes are provided, the validity of any decision of an government minister, inferior court, tribunal, local authority or official body may be challenged by someone with sufficient interest by judicial review in the Administrative Court of the Queen's Bench Division. A single judge first decides whether the matter is fit to bring to the court and if so the matter is allowed to go forward to a full judicial review hearing with one or more judges. In addition, the Queen's Bench Divisional Court hears appeals on points of law from the Magistrates' Court[5] and from the Crown Court.[6]). 

---the Chancery Division(The Chancery Division (housed in the Rolls Building) deals with business law, trusts law, probate law, insolvency, and land law in relation to issues of equity).

---the Family Division(will handle personal and family related affairs...personal human matters such as divorce, children, probate and medical treatment).

Back to the story:

From seen above, it is obvious and not difficult to conclude that UK STATE is using as a anti democratic instrument(tool) against British people what is Queen's Bench Division court option !!! HOWEVER, THE ONLY TIME WHEN THIS HIGH COURT DIVISION WOULD COME TO LEGALLY PLAY(can be triggered) IN BREXIT CASE IS IF THE BREXIT REFERENDUM WOULD BE PROVENLY CONDUCTED IN ILLEGAL MATTER(if serious voting violations would take place prior/during or after referendum which did NOT !!!). 

DOES ANY COURT ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD HAVE PRIORITY OR POWER OVER PEOPLE'S WILL(the outcome) OF BY STATE HELD REFERENDUM OR ELECTIONS !!!? I HAVE NOT HEARD FOR SUCH CASE YET - EVER !!! IN FACT, THIS WAS NOT THE CASE EVEN IN THE SOVIET UNION(that is when and where it was enough that people knew how elections were held...Joseph Stalin stated, I cite "It's not the people who vote that count. It's the people who count the votes."..the point is that people at least knew that USSR was USSR..not a democracy, not a dictatorship, but instead a tyranny !!!) !!! 

IN FACT, THERE IS NOWHERE SPECIFIED THAT WILL OF THE PEOPLE(majority of the people in UK) CAN BE CHALLENGED ON SUCH(the Queen's Bench Division) COURT OR BY ANY AUTHORITY OTHER THAN GOD !!!

AND WHILE MAIN STREAM MEDIA(nothing else than 72 years old leftish/communist propaganda = vacuum world of lies and dementia) IS REPEATEDLY SUGGESTING WHAT ARTICLE 50 IS(they lie about it as well), MAIN STREAM MEDIA FAILS TO EXPLAIN WHAT IS EXPLAINED HERE OR HOW SOMETHING LIKE ARTICLE 50 CAN BE BLOCKED(nope, parliament doesn't have the right to decide against the outcome of the people's elections/referendum...parliamentarian losers are there to only earn free money or get free ride in another words and obey will of the British majority in this case) BY HIGH COURT OF THE COURT PROCEDURE ITSELF THAT WOULD HAVE LEGAL GROUNDS TO STALL ARTICLE 50 !!!

Well...that pretty much explains that UK is no longer or ever was a democracy during past 72 years...things get unfortunately worse for British people and then even worse !!! UK is not only not a democracy as the British government is trying to sell lie to the world that one is, but is also not a dictatorship because written rules are not even rules as you see here !!! UK IS UNFORTUNATELY A TYRANNY !!! A JAIL OF THE BRITISH PEOPLE SAME AS EUROPEAN UNION IS A MARXIST JAIL OF THE EUROPEAN NATIONS !!!

I also believe that it was not 51.9% of British who chose to leave the EU, but in fact much much more !!! British government have faked European(Brexit) referendum just as US elections are faked !!! I probably don't have to explain to you how those are rigged, but have you paid special attention to so called public polls in which main stream media have repeatedly reported for months ahead of debates that Clinton is in lead for 6/7% till one week before the debates when they would suggest that Trump is catching up to Clinton and is even 1% ahead of her on what(after the debates) they would again begun to suggest how she is ahead of him for 6/7%(READ HERE to understand how it is done) and so on !!!??

TO USE ABOVE DESCRIBED SUBLIMINAL METHOD(same as in US elections - READ HERE) OF PURSUING BRITISH PEOPLE AGAINST THEMSELVES(to make them embrace EU and quite Brexit), MAIN STREAM MEDIA AND CORRUPT BRITISH GOVERNMENT HAVE HAD ALSO RELEASED THE NEWS TODAY HOW BRITISH POUND JUMPED RIGHT BACK TO A VALUE OF 1.25 EURO(READ HERE)....

What else is new in UK !!!???

Well...Prince Harry is publicly dating ugglier than uggly negress these days(making a free commercial for Clinton and against Brexiters)....not what he sees on her, but instead how he manages not to see is the question of to be or not to be - is what William Shakespeare would say....pretty disgraceful and disgusting behavior I must say, but hey...we learn best per who is what in key moments and critical times as the one described right under this very article !!! DON'T WE !!!!???

Momma of Meghan Markle(Prince Harry's new lover), Doria Ragland is on the left side....I have watched this rich boy for quite a while now and have concluded that he doesn't really know what his purpose is in life...on several occasions, he was totally lost during his trips to South Africa where he have done nothing for white and heavily genocided minority while expressing totally evident admiration for negresses !!! Who knows...perhaps fact that over 90.000 whites were killed in South Africa by black savages during just past 23 years and that over one million of them(whites) are stationed in white South African concentration camps(aka "squatter camps") as I write this article(today), arouses his penis...I wouldn't be surprised at all !!! He is stupid enough not to understand that his mom(whose fan I am not nor I ever was) was killed in a freakish assassination plot committed by liberals and exploited to full potential by liberal media(same to which we witnesses today in US elections) to blackmail royal family into total submission(I have rigid proofs for my claims and will record video on this subject) !!!

Prince Harry will protect his tribal lover from evil America...just say and you got it honey...Canada is waiting on you and your bros...Canada needs your kind to grow the economy...

Meghan Markle is a Hillary Clinton's supporter and admirer since childhood...you should be too !!! Learn and become part of ever-changing revolution led by main stream media(just being really really sarcastic)...

Prince Harry in his best element...is or will be Meghan Markle only a unfulfilled Harry's sexual fantasy of what you see here !!?? Hey, Harry...there is still time for you to change your mind...

Thank you for reading this through...educated audience is my best companion....this free article was written and prepared for you by Bastian Auser

END

Here is the typical main stream media article(72 years old Marxist diarrhea) for you if you wish to pollute your brain...

MIRROR.CO.UK

What is Article 50 and why is it key to Brexit?

The Treaty of Lisbon, signed in December 2007, is the European Union's most recent constitution - and Article 50 makes provision for countries that want to leave

The UK has voted for Brexit - and ever since it looked like we would vote Leave, commentators have been talking about Article 50.

Today, the High Court derailed Prime Minister Theresa May's plans to trigger Article 50, saying MPs will need to vote on it first.

But what exactly is it and what does it mean for Brexit?

Over half of voters in the EU referendum (51.9%) chose to leave the union, but it is not as simple as just waving goodbye to Europe.

No state has left the European Union before, although Greenland did vote to quit the EEC.

How the UK goes about its conscious uncoupling after its 43 year relationship is governed by Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty.

In October, Theresa May told the Conservative Party conference that she planned to trigger Article 50 by the end of March 2017.

But today the High Court put a spanner in the works by ruling the PM does not have the power to start Brexit proceedings without first allowing MPs to vote.

So what is Article 50 and how will it work?

The Treaty of Lisbon, signed in December 2007, is the European Union's most recent constitution - and Article 50 makes provision for countries that want to leave.

It sets out the exit process but is deliberately vague – meaning member states could be forced to enter into long negotiations to thrash out the terms of any deal.

Even the photo was taken by Rothschild's Routers(can be seen on the bottom right side - Jew Rothschild owns Routers). 

Immediately after Article 50 is invoked, a two-year window begins during which Britain will be expected to enter talks on plans for its relationship with the rest of the Union post- Brexit .

Topics on the table could include the UK's access to the single market, travel arrangements and what will happen to people from EU countries who are working or living in Britain.

But it's not all smooth sailing – all 28 member states have to unanimously agree to the terms of a deal meaning the negotiations could take years.

In the meantime Britain is still bound by the obligations and responsibilities of EU membership.

A senior EU official said: "The Article 50 process is a divorce: who gets the house, who gets the kids, who gets the bank accounts.

"It is spouses, instead of working through lawyers, throwing dishes at each other."

In a joint statement issued in July, EU leaders Martin Schulz, Donald Tusk, Mark Rutte and Jean-Claude Juncker said: “We now expect the United Kingdom government to give effect to this decision of the British people as soon as possible, however painful that process may be.

“We have rules to deal with this in an orderly way.

“Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union sets out the procedure to be followed if a Member State decides to leave the European Union.

Have your say in the comments below

“We stand ready to launch negotiations swiftly with the United Kingdom regarding the terms and conditions of its withdrawal from the European Union.

“Until this process of negotiations is over, the United Kingdom remains a member of the European Union, with all the rights and obligations that derive from this.”

The High Court ruling

On November 3, campaigners led by hedge fund manager Gina Miller, won a High Court fight to give MPs a vote on Brexit and derailed Theresa May's plans to invoke Article 50 before March 2017.

The Government has announced it will appeal the decision to the Supreme Court.

By main stream media fabricated(glorified) negress Gina Miller who wants to look smart in front of the cameras doesn't even have a f**** clue what Article 50 is...they just need her on this photo to promote wrong impression about so called "minorities"...they could choose millions of other nags for this very occasion, but hey...she fits the hysterical nuisance...the bottom line is that Marxists in UK don't give up and they even count that you my friends will....they believe that they will even manage to steer out of this situation as victors...

Three of England’s top judges gave the historic ruling today after a costly three-day hearing.

The High Court ruled the Prime Minister did not have the power to trigger two-year exit process Article 50 before a vote in Parliament.

Introducing his judgement, Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas said: “This is a pure question of law. The court is not concerned with and does not express any view about the merits of leaving the European Union. That is a political issue.”

He added: “The court expressly accepts the principle arguments of the claimants. The government does not have the power of prerogative”

Mrs May was relying on the ‘royal prerogative’ - which a team led by investment fund manager Gina Miller said was not enough to ignore elected MPs.

Anti-Brexiters celebrated the news on Twitter - and even some Leave voters are happy about it.

One man admitted he voted Brexit but hoped the decision could 'correct his stupidity'.

But not everyone was happy about it.

Nigel Farage, the former UKIP leader who led the Brexit campaign, took to Twitter to say: ""I worry that a betrayal may be near at hand."

Others also claimed that the ruling was a betrayal for the majority who voted.

Killary Clinton knew about questions ahead of presidential debate and did not report criminal misconduct to authorities !!!??? ARREST HER IMMEDIATELY !!! ARREST HER TODAY IT IS YOUR JOB - YOUR DUTY !!!

A public question for FBI !!! Since Clinton received questions ahead of the presidential debate(READ HERE) and have failed to report such criminal misconduct to authorities, shouldn't she be arrested and IMMEDIATELY charged with felony and if not - how so !!!??????
Clinton is 100% GUILTY !!! Clinton committed minimum a criminal PERJURY in this case alone(her felony also involves betrayal against USA) !!! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perjury Perjuries are punishable with up to 5 years imprisonment !!! ARREST KILLARY CLINTON NOW - TODAY !!! IT IS YOUR JOB - YOUR DUTY !!! Please read and learn about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felony

How long are we going to watch FBI/CIA and main stream media to cover up the truth about and for the sake of criminal felon Killary Clinton who happens to be even 2016 presidential candidate !!!????




United States[edit]

Perjury operates in American law as an inherited principle of the common law of England, which defined the act as the "willful and corrupt giving, upon a lawful oath, or in any form allowed by law to be substituted for an oath, in a judicial proceeding or course of justice, of a false testimony material to the issue or matter of inquiry."[26] William Blackstone touched on the subject in his Commentaries on the Laws of England, establishing perjury as "a crime committed when a lawful oath is administered, in some judicial proceeding, to a person who swears willfully, absolutely, and falsely, in a matter material to the issue or point in question."[27] The punishment for perjury under the common law has varied from death to banishment and has included such grotesque penalties as severing the tongue of the perjurer.[28] The definitional structure of perjury provides an important framework for legal proceedings, as the component parts of this definition have permeated jurisdictional lines, finding a home in American legal constructs. As such, the main tenets of perjury, including mens rea, a lawful oath, occurring during a judicial proceeding, a false testimony have remained necessary pieces of perjury’s definition in the United States.[29] Statutory definitions[edit] Perjury’s current position in the American legal system takes the form of state and federal statutes. Most notably, the United States Code prohibits perjury, which is defined in two senses for federal purposes as someone who: (1) Having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or (2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true[30] The above statute provides for a fine and/or up to five years in prison as punishment. Within federal jurisdiction, statements made in two broad categories of judicial proceedings may qualify as perjurious: 1) Federal official proceedings, and 2) Federal Court or Grand Jury proceedings. A third type of perjury entails the procurement of perjurious statements from another person.[28] More generally, the statement must occur in the "course of justice," but this definition leaves room open for interpretation.[31] One particularly precarious aspect of this phrasing is that it entails knowledge of the accused person’s perception of the truthful nature of events and not necessarily the actual truth of those events. It is important to note the distinction here, between giving a false statement under oath and merely misstating a fact accidentally, though this distinction can be especially difficult to discern in court of law.[32] Precedents[edit] The development of perjury law in the United States centers on United States v. Dunnigan, a seminal case that set out the parameters of perjury within United States law. The court uses the Dunnigan-based legal standard to determine if an accused person, "[T]estifying under oath or affirmation violates this section if she gives false testimony concerning a material matter with the willful intent to provide false testimony, rather than as a result of confusion, mistake, or faulty memory."[33] However, a defendant shown to be willfully ignorant may in fact be eligible for perjury prosecution.[34] The Dunnigan distinction manifests its importance with regard to the relation between two component parts of perjury’s definition: in willfully giving a false statement, a person must understand that she is giving a false statement to be considered a perjurer under the Dunnigan framework. Deliberation on the part of the defendant is required for a statement to constitute perjury.[31] Jurisprudential developments in the American law of perjury have revolved around the facilitation of "perjury prosecutions and thereby enhance the reliability of testimony before federal courts and grand juries."[35] With this goal in mind, Congress has sometimes expanded the grounds on which an individual may be prosecuted for perjury, with section 1623 of the United States Code recognizing the utterance of two mutually incompatible statements as grounds for perjury indictment even if neither can unequivocally be proven false.[36] However, the two statements must be so mutually incompatible that at least one must necessarily be false; it is irrelevant whether the false statement can be specifically identified from among the two.[37] It thus falls on the government to show that a defendant (a) knowingly made a (b) false (c) material statement (d) under oath (e) in a legal proceeding.[38] These proceedings can be ancillary to normal court proceedings, and thus, even such menial interactions as bail hearings can qualify as protected proceedings under this statute.[39] Wilfulness is an element of the offense. The mere existence of two mutually exclusive factual statements is not sufficient to prove perjury; the prosecutor nonetheless has the duty to plead and prove statement was willfully made. Mere contradiction will not sustain the charge; there must be strong corroborative evidence of the contradiction.[40] One significant legal distinction lies in the specific realm of knowledge necessarily possessed by a defendant for her statements to be properly called perjury. Though the defendant must knowingly render a false statement in a legal proceeding or under federal jurisdiction, the defendant need not know that they are speaking under such conditions for the statement to constitute perjury.[41] All tenets of perjury qualification persist- the “knowingly” aspect of telling the false statement simply does not apply to the defendant’s knowledge about the person she intends to deceive. Materiality[edit] Perjury law’s evolution in the United States has experienced the most debate with regards to the materiality requirement. Fundamentally, statements that are literally true cannot provide the basis for a perjury charge[42] (as they do not meet the falsehood requirement) just as answers to truly ambiguous statements cannot constitute perjury.[43] However, such fundamental truths of perjury law become muddled when discerning the materiality of a given statement and the way in which it was material to the given case. In United States v. Brown, the court defined material statements as those with "a natural tendency to influence, or is capable of influencing, the decision of the decision-making body to be addressed," such as a jury or grand jury.[44] While courts have specifically made clear certain instances which have succeeded or failed to meet the nebulous threshold for materiality, the topic remains unresolved in large part, except in certain legal areas where intent manifests itself in an abundantly clear fashion, such as with the so-called perjury trap, a specific situation in which a prosecutor calls a person to testify before a grand jury with the intent of drawing a perjurious statement from the person being questioned.[45] Defense of recantation[edit] Despite a tendency of American perjury law toward broad prosecutory power under perjury statutes, American perjury law has afforded potential defendants a new form of defense not found in the British Common Law. This defense requires that an individual admit to making a perjurious statement during that same proceeding and recanting the statement.[46] Though this defensive loophole slightly narrows the types of cases which may be prosecuted for perjury, the effect of this statutory defense is to promote a truthful retelling of facts by witnesses, thus helping to ensure the reliability of American court proceedings just as broadened perjury statutes aimed to do. Subornation of perjury[edit] Subornation of perjury stands as a subset of American perjury laws and prohibits an individual from inducing another to commit perjury.[47] Subornation of perjury entails equivalent possible punishments as perjury on the federal level. This crime requires an extra level of satisfactory proof, as prosecutors must show not only that perjury occurred, but also that the defendant positively induced said perjury. Furthermore, the inducing defendant must know that the suborned statement is a false, perjurious statement.[48]

Voting machines in US 2016 elections are ALREADY rigged !!!

Excellent video on rigged voting machines from  Alex Jones...video explains how those are exactly hacked !!! 

You may be wondering what the term “black box” means. A “black box” system is non-transparent; its functions are hidden from the public. Elections, of course, should not be black box systems. With voting machines, all political power can be converted to the hands of a few anonymous subcontractors.

A Soros-linked voting machine company has included a source code which enables the machines to be rigged by skimming the percentages and tweaking the numbers using hidden decimal points.

Killary Clinton and main stream media launch new subliminal manipulation attack on US population with hope to somehow steer consciousness of the US voters into self admitted defeat just 7 days prior to election day in 2016 !!!

Donald Trump have had minimum 65% approval rate throughout entire 2016 elections vs Killary Clinton, so how could he be ahead now(7 days prior to election day) what liberal outlet claims is one point(1%) !!!???

Lies lies and lies and off course crime = main stream media = vacuum world of lies and dementia !!!

What was/is main stream media's strategy !!? Simple, but very effective - even Donald have had his weak moments at times...Repeat the lie how Clinton is ahead of Trump 4% till one week prior to US debate(s) and then claim that claim that he is ahead of her for just one week....after totally rigged presidential debates(read here) in which main stream media was and is deeply involved per US Gov., repeat the lie again that Clinton is ahead of Trump for 6/7% while publishing her all over the news as smiling...

This time is no different...main stream media who was caught lying and engaging in anti constitutional(beyond criminal) rigging of US elections is now using as an a lie this type of lying known also as autosuggestia(autosuggestion is a hypnotic or subconscious adoption of an idea that one has originated oneself, e.g. through repetition of verbal/written statements to oneself in order to change behavior...however, deception is this time done via use of repetitive written lies implemented against general population by main stream media as seen in this very case !!! This type of manipulations belongs into category related to subliminal manipulation tactics = READ HERE AN EXAMPLE) to deceive public per truth about 2016 elections(it have had happened already before, but this time matters !!!) !!! 

In fact, I anticipate(my personal forecast) that main stream media will most likely release another attack(even if totally baseless or nonessential, they will sensationalize one out of proportions and desperately claim that this is it) on Donald Trump just prior to election day and then again claim how Kilary Clinton is leading for 4/5 % again(meaning that they will reserve day or two the most for people to absorb Trump's 1% lead news as seen here and then release again some bogus news again against Trump on what they will begun to claim how she is again in lead...new news released against Trump will take place therefore according to my calculations on about November the 3/4 and their lie how she is again ahead of him on polls will follow on 6/7th = on 8th is the official election day..SCAM AFTER SCAM AFTER SCAM !!!)....

Autosuggestion is a psychological technique that was developed by apothecary Émile Coué at the beginning of the 20th century. It is a form of self-induced suggestion wherein the thoughts, feelings, or behavior of an individual are guided by oneself. This technique is often used in self-hypnosis.

Where and what now Killary(main press or vacuum world of lies and dementia) !!!???

This free article was written and prepared for you by Bastian Auser

END

From Libeal news(manufactured lies) outlet known as independent.co.uk !!!

Donald Trump overtakes Hillary Clinton for first time since May in ABC poll

Republican now has a one point lead in election that is too close to call, according to major survey

Donald Trump has overtaken Hillary Clinton to take a single percentage point lead in a poll by ABC, the first time he has done so since May.

Though the result remains within ABC's margin of error, the broadcaster said the leaders changing places was a noteworthy moment with just a week to go until election day.

ABC has had the two candidates virtually neck-and-neck for the past week, with aggregated results suggesting Ms Clinton was ahead by just 0.4 of a percentage point.

But enthusiasm for the Democrat candidate has slumped after the FBI revealed it would be opening up a new investigation into a set of emails sent during Ms Clinton's time as Secretary of State.

It makes the election too close to call, based on ABC's poll alone. Among the other runners, Gary Johnson dropped to a new low of 3 per cent and Green candidate Jill Stein polled at 2 per cent.

The network, which surveyed across the country, has not had Mr Trump in the lead since he was +2 in a hypothetical run-off against Ms Clinton back on 23 May this year.

Then, Mr Trump had just secured the GOP nomination, while Ms Clinton was still engaged in a fight for her place with Bernie Sanders.

Most polls also showed a spike in support for Mr Trump in late July, though ABC was not among those who had the Republican taking an outright lead.

It should also be noted that even this close to an election, a poll on voter preferences is not necessarily indicative of the final result.

ABC noted that Mitt Romney was one point ahead of Barack Obama in a comparable tracking poll in 2012, while John Kerry was also +1 against George Bush a week out in 2004.

Will Donald Trump press criminal charges and file the law suit against satanic CNN which was in it since very beginning of presidential campaign to seal his and America's faith in freedom !!?

This is how by JEW(spawn of Satan controls 96% of world's media) controlled main stream media tries to rationalize(cover up for their owner or to deter attention away from real liabilities - blaming it all on messenger Brazile and not the one who have released the information to Brazile) the involvement in 2016 US presidential elections... 

I think he should !!! Does it get more satanic than by JEW(read here to learn how JEW took over CNN) operated and owned CNN !!? I don't think so...

Do you folks remember CNN boasting for weeks about Donald's tape from 2005 !!? Do you remember CNN boosting(promoting) with lies Clinton while at the same time it was the CNN that have supplied Killary Clinton ahead of the presidential debate(very likely all other debates as well) with prepared questions !!!?

Just waw...not surprised as I know what JEW(owns 96% of the world's media) can, does, and have done to the world and America with his media bias...

Hey Satan...where is your front page story today !!!?? You were sarcastically loud even about Donald's suggesting what was and is more than obvious = rigged US elections and him not accepting the outcome of rigged 2016 US elections...WHERE IS THE FRONT STORY ABOUT YOU CNN WHO WAS(from very beginning) AND IS INVOLVED IN RIGGING OF THE US ELECTIONS TODAY !!!? Where are you CNN !!????

Hey JEW at CNN, you don't really expect us to believe that Homo naledi Donna(she is too ugly for me to have even her picture posted in this article)  "leaked" something that she not supposed to even know about !!!?? Or do you !!??? 

Homo naledi Brazile on presidential debate outcome right after the presidential debate...she can lie straight to the camera - best developed trade in Homo naledi's species(one thing they are really best at)...WILL THIS SHIT HOMO NALEDI FACE CRIMINAL CHARGES AND LONG TERM JAIL SENTENCE AS THE RESULT OF CONSPIRACY IN US ELECTIONS !!!??? WHERE WAS THE FBI...WHERE WAS THE CIA AND WHY IT TAKES FOREIGN HACKERS OR WIKILEAKS FOR US(broad population) TO FINALLY LEARN THE TRUTH ABOUT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S SECRET GOVERNMENT DEALINGS WITH SATAN WHEN US ELECTIONS ARE IN QUESTION !!??? WHO DO THIS USA GOVERNMENT AGENCIES WORK FOR SINCE THER JOB PERFORMANCE IS ANTI AMERICAN !!!???

Satan's seed also mentions word GOD....it is why I have never congregated myself in a church that worships reconciliation with them....that kinds of church(es) is(are) NOT  for me !!! God have never ever required any individual created in his image to congregate(reconciliate) with Satan's spawn...EVER !!!

Let me calm you down for that matter CNN and other main stream media(vacuum world of lies and dementia) outlets out there...we do not...we are well aware that when you talk or write is all lie that is about !!!

WHAT IS YOUR OPINION READERS...DO YOU THINK DONALD SHOULD PRESS CRIMINAL CHARGES AND ONE TRILLION DOLLAR LAW SUIT AGAINST CNN(Time Warner) !!??? DO YOU THINK THAT RIGGED AND IMMORAL(criminally insane by Satan's spawn operated) NEWS OUTLETS LIKE CNN SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO OPERATE ON US SOIL AS WELL AS WORLD WIDE !!!??? Leave me a comment...tell us what you think...

And the last question under this subject...WHO WAS AND IS CLEAR WINNER OF PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES AND CAMPAIGN IN 2016 !!!????

HIS NAME IS DONALD TRUMP !!!

This free article was written for you by Bastian Auser

End....

Here are a typical dis-info articles from liblab media(copy paste operation as this is all they do from one another) on this very subject...this one is taken lets say from JEWHOO(aka Yahoo)....

CNN cuts ties with Donna Brazile after hacked emails show she gave Clinton campaign debate questions

CNN quietly cut ties with Donna Brazile, the acting Democratic National Committee chair and a longtime contributor on the cable news network, after hacked emails published by WikiLeaks revealed that she had provided questions to the Hillary Clinton campaign in advance of a town hall and debate hosted by CNN during the Democratic primary.

According to a spokeswoman for the network, CNN accepted Brazile’s resignation on Oct. 14.

The emails showed that Brazile — whose role as a CNN contributor was suspended in July after she took over for departing DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz — shared with the Clinton campaign a question that would be posed to Clinton before the CNN Democratic Debate in Flint, Mich., in March, and another before a CNN town hall in Columbus, Ohio, a week later.

The network vehemently denied giving Brazile access to debate questions in advance.

“CNN never gave Brazile access to any questions, prep material, attendee list, background information or meetings in advance of a town hall or debate,” the spokeswoman, Lauren Pratapas, said in a statement. “We are completely uncomfortable with what we have learned about her interactions with the Clinton campaign while she was a CNN contributor.”

Brazile has appeared as a guest on Yahoo News’ live coverage of campaign events, including the recent presidential debates, but was not paid for any of those appearances.

Brazile did not respond to a request for comment.

On Twitter, she referred media to her previous statement about the emails exposed by WikiLeaks. (“This is exactly what the Russians intended to do. And they’re doing it,” Brazile said on Oct. 11.) She also thanked CNN and wished her former colleagues well.

All of the major cable news networks feature paid political operatives on air. But CNN has been harshly criticized for employing Corey Lewandowski, Donald Trump’s former campaign manager, while he was still being paid $20,000 per month by the Republican nominee.

Before leaving the Trump campaign in June, Lewandowski signed a nondisclosure agreement that would presumably prevent him from speaking candidly about the candidate. According to Politico, that agreement caused Lewandowski to lose a $1.2 million offer from HarperCollins to write a book about his experience managing the brash real estate mogul.

In August, CNN chief Jeff Zucker defended the hiring of Lewandowski.

“The reason we hired Corey is that now that we are in the general election, I think it’s really important to have voices on CNN who are supportive of the Republican nominee,” Zucker told Variety. “It’s hard to find a lot of those. Our competitors tried to hire him too.”

“I actually think he’s done a really nice job,” Zucker added. “He’s come under a much greater spotlight because of who he is and the relationship he’s had with the media. As a result, people are going to be more critical.”

Brazile has seen the effects of being under a greater spotlight firsthand.

On Sunday, she warned those sending her hateful messages online, and expressed universal campaign fatigue.